| Evolution |
|
"In
the survival of favoured individuals and races, during the constantly-recurring
struggle for existence, we see a powerful and ever-acting form
of selection." Charles Darwin
|
|
Evolution
Theory Overview
"Nothing
in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution".
Theodosius Dobzhansky (geneticist)
The
often seen quote above by famous geneticist Dobzhansky elegantly
captures the paramount importance of evolution. Stated differently,
evolution is the single organizing principle of all the biological
sciences. The terms evolution and natural
selection are often used synonymously, though natural
selection itself is but one of the mechanisms by which evolution
operates. The mechanisms of evolution are ubiquitous and not
limited to biology, and as a theory, evolution is as validated
as Newton's Laws of Motion, and clearly as important for the
understanding of the physical world. Yet, and paradoxically,
evolution is either misunderstood or even adamantly denied
by a large proportion of the public.
Darwin's
Observations and Conceptualizations
Darwin's observations during his travels ultimately led
him to four fundamental concepts that he elegantly put
forth on his 1859 book, Origin
of Species:
-
Adaptation:
all organisms
adapt to their environments.
-
Variation
(or diversity): organisms exhibit variability in their
traits (in modern terms, genotype
variability determines the phenotype
variability).
-
Over-reproduction:
organism populations tend to reproduce beyond the environment's
ability to support them ultimately encountering a limit
on population size.
-
Reproductive
success: Organisms exhibit variability in adaptation
to environment; hence some will survive and reproduce
better than others, a process known as natural selection.
This is often referred to as "survival of the fittest".
In reality, such attributes as speed, size or strength
is only more fit for survival if it endows the organism
with a reproductive advantage in the existing enviroment.
Those organisms best adapted to the environment will
have a greater chance of surviving and passing their
genes on to the next generation.
Darwin's
conceptualization of natural selection was a remarkable accomplishment
in the mid-19th century, and Darwin was right, within the
limits of the science at the time. However, that Darwin's
natural selection is perhaps too easy to understand led to
misunderstandings such as "survival of the fittest",
and its sad extrapolation to social Darwinism. Darwin's natural
selection could not incorporate gene
inheritance or random gene mutation because genes had not
yet been discovered. Modern evolutionary theory describes
decent with modification at the level of genes, phenotypes,
and populations whereas Darwin described evolution at the
level of organisms, speciation
and individuals.
"From
the first dawn of life, all organic beings are found to resemble
each other in descending degrees, so they can be classed in
groups under groups." Charles Darwin
Evolution
and the Tree of Life
The
modern theory of evolution is based on two primary tenets:
-
All
living things are related to one another to varying degrees
through common decent (share common ancestors), have developed
from other species, and all life forms have a single common
ancestor.
-
The
origin of a new species results from random heritable genetic
mutations (changes), some of which are more likely to spread
and persist in a gene pool than others. Mutations that result
in an advantage to survive and reproduce are more likely
to be retained and propagated than mutations that do not
result in a survival to reproduce advantage.
Decent
with modification, or evolution, is often described by the so-called
tree of life. A tree is inherently hierarchical, as is the great
"Tree of Life". Its boughs are analogous to the higher
Linnean rankings, i.e., the domains, kingdoms, phyla, classes,
etc. Smaller branches correspond to middle rankings, i.e., the
orders, families and genera. At the end of the many branches
are the twigs, the uncountable species, some 99% of which are
extinct. The great Tree of Life is real. It is a phylogenetic
tree representing the unique ancestral history of each and every
creature. Darwin believed that all creatures on Earth might
have originated from a single common ancestor so that each species
through geological history fit somewhere in an overarching metaphorical
tree; he elegantly wrote:
"The
affinities of all the beings of the same class have sometimes
been represented by a great tree. I believe this simile largely
speaks the truth. The green and budding twigs may represent
existing species; and those produced during each former year
may represent the long succession of extinct species . . . The
limbs divided into great branches, and these into lesser and
lesser branches, were themselves once, when the tree was small,
budding twigs; and this connexion of the former and present
buds by ramifying branches may well represent the classification
of all extinct and living species in groups subordinate to groups
. . . From the first growth of the tree, many a limb and branch
has decayed and dropped off, and these lost branches of various
sizes may represent those whole orders, families, and genera
which have now no living representatives, and which are known
to us only from having been found in a fossil state . . . As
buds give rise by growth to fresh buds, and these, if vigorous,
branch out and overtop on all a feebler branch, so by generation
I believe it has been with the Tree of Life, which fills with
its dead and broken branches the crust of the earth, and covers
the surface with its ever branching and beautiful ramifications"
(Charles Darwin, 1859).
|
The
eye of the Trilobite was already highly sophisticated
by Cambrian time - yet, it was hardly a perfect design
- rather, it resulted from the tinkering of natural selection
on the genomic ingredients that already existed. |
Misconceptions
about evolution
Unfortunately,
misconceptions about evolution are ubiquitous. One prominent
misconception is that evolution proceeds in a specific direction
leading to the improvement of organisms - this is often stated
as climbing an evolutionary ladder. This is simply not the case.
Rather, organisms either adapt to environments that are always
undergoing change, or they risk extinction.
The
concept of the ladder may comfort some, especially since
it justifies assigning humans to the pinnacle of perfection.
Natural selection does not work that way. Rather, nature uses
what is available (i.e., in genomic diversity), keeps what works,
and discards the rest; actually, the genetic material is not
discarded, but is turned off -- most of the human genome comprises
unused sequences that are a legacy of evolution. Nature abounds
with organisms that humans would never "design" as
perfect. The "lowly" sponge and the jellyfish are
two examples; these creatures with a few simple cell types have
persisted from the Precambrian, and have changed very little.
Other ancient creatures that survive because of specialized
adaptation are fungi, mosses, sharks, and horseshoe crabs. Thus,
in the context of natural selection, fitness is inextricably
linked to the environment (and adaptation to changes), and NOT
to progress or perfection. "Evolutionary ladder" is,
in fact, an oxymoron.
It
is diversity that enables
the struggle to survive the ability to select the favorable
features already there for usage. Even animals the appear very
similar may differ markedly at the level of their genes. The
variation is what evolution acts upon within a single kind to
ultimately originate a new one.
|
Other
Evolution Topics:
The
Cambrian Explosion
Darwin's
finches, decent with modification and natural selection
The
evolutionary arms race - examples among trilobites
Evolution
of Various Taxa:
Endosymbiosis
- A Primary Evolutionary Milstone
Cambrian
Explosion
Archaeopteryx
with Dinosaur Affinity
Evolutionary
Placement of the Enigmatic Carpoids (Stylophorans)
Evolution
of Insects
Speciation
Puntuated
Equilibrium
Sex,
alleles. diversity and rock and roll. |
|